Cobb County Board of Commissioners Blocks Opportunity for Dissent

Read the stunning rebuke of the Cobb County Board of Commissioners by the Atlanta Journal & Constitution as well as Chairman Tim Lee’s continued excuses for the process.  These are behind the pay wall.  You can comment here or on AJC if you have access.

Posted: 12:00 a.m. Saturday, June 14, 2014
Atlanta Journal Constitution

Recently, the Cobb County Board of Commissioners ratified a series of agreements between the county and the Atlanta Braves obligating Cobb taxpayers with $397 million in revenue bonds. Braves President John Schuerholz has publicly stated this deal would not have been completed if more time had been allowed for public scrutiny.

What the commission allowed on the night of the vote was a sickening display of affection as 12 supporters showered praise and admiration on the board for negotiating the public financing of a private sports stadium. This shows a lack of leadership and a serious breach of the public trust.

Knowing the contentious nature of this transaction and the magnitude of the obligation from the taxpayers, the commission should have made every effort to hear dissenting opinion. The AJC later reported that 3 of the commissioners were open to amending the rules to allow additional comment from the public. Any one of them could have made a motion. Once seconded, the chairman would have no choice but put the motion to a vote.

Chairman Tim Lee claims rules were followed. Yet the board’s Rules of Procedure were violated by releasing the agenda on Friday after 5 p.m., less than 5 days before a scheduled vote. Chairman Lee seems more concerned with getting the agenda of the Chamber of Commerce passed than he is with transparency and upholding the citizens’ rights.

Under the Georgia Constitution, the people have a right to petition those vested with the powers of government for redress of grievances. Based on that principle, the board of commissioners has a higher obligation to hear from those that disagree with the funding for the Braves stadium. Instead, they chose to disenfranchise the citizens of their right to speak.

From the very beginning, this deal was done in secret, rushed to a vote after only 12 days, and now the commission has blocked public comment.  These are the actions of an oligarchy.  Ironic that this was pushed through following Memorial Day.  The Braves deal is just a symptom of a larger political disease running rampant through our governments.

Whether taxes are raised or money is shifted from other priorities, the fact remains this kind of public-private partnership is nothing more than corporate fascism, a merger of state and corporate interests benefiting the elite. That’s money that could be going to the general welfare of the county to fund schools, roads or other public services.

We elected the board of commissioners to represent the people, not the Chamber of Commerce and a multimillion-dollar media empire. No wonder public trust in government has deteriorated.

We’ve come to expect large document dumps after hours on holiday weekends from the federal government in Washington. Is this going to be the “Cobb way” of doing the peoples’ business? As usual, the deal is touted as a great model of public-private partnership that creates jobs and grows the economy. Isn’t it really another PPP that’s more about private profits, power, and politics than anything benefiting the public?

Field Searcy, a Cobb County resident, represents, an education campaign by the Transportation Leadership Coalition.


Light this field

Posted: 12:00 a.m. Saturday, June 14, 2014
Atlanta Journal Constitution

It is a long-held tenet of good governance in this country that the inherent power in any political subdivision resides firmly and ultimately with the people — and not those they elect to represent them. Or it should.

This non-negotiable truth has been cast aside and utterly ignored in Cobb County. The board of commissioners there badly needs a refresher course in this essential lesson of civics. This realization is based on the commission’s ongoing conduct around the matter of relocating the Atlanta Braves to new digs north of the ‘Hooch.

Cobb officials’ behavior thus far has drawn to mind images of questionable-at-best backroom deals forged in secret by political kingpins who believe their positions are beyond, or impervious to, public oversight and accountability. The process thus far as this deal clanks along has heavily tarnished the reputation of a county that, not long ago, was widely spoken of as an example of forthright, open government.

No more can that be said. Which is a profound shame, both for that county and the region it is part of.

In our view, there is no reasonable reason why a proposal of such importance to Cobb, this entire metro area and, arguably, much of the Southeast, had to be sprung upon the public and raced to done-deal status in scarcely two weeks’ time start to finish. Such a breakneck, reckless really, pace may have safeguarded vague business interests, but it has heavily damaged the public’s trust in government — in Cobb and beyond, we believe. Both this fractured region, and Cobb itself, should not have to bear such inflation in the price of civic distrust.

With hundreds of millions of public dollars now linked to this deal, taxpayers are fully justified in demanding that they have a right to know just what is, or was, going on much earlier than they did. And these same citizens are correct in questioning why this agreement could not have been conducted to a much-larger degree in the clean light of day. To do otherwise, as Cobb has done, frankly stinks.

Yet, the commission has been maddeningly consistent in its lockout of those who might dare criticize its maneuverings. During a commission meeting last month, opponents or skeptics of the proposal were barred from stating their case. Bureaucratic reasons feebly offered for this outrageous affront of the right to petition government also badly fail the smell test.

Cobb’s mulish insistence on keeping the public as far away from, for as long a period as possible, the decisions around the Braves’ move also unfairly call into question, if not impugn, the merits of what, at its core, is simply a business deal. Albeit a big one that moves an Atlanta — and Southern — institution from the central city to a new OTP home.

It’s worth stating here that this newspaper is not opposed to the team’s move. This Editorial Board has no position on where the Atlanta Braves ultimately play America’s pastime. In our view, the team, as a private-sector entity, is to be expected to seek the deal offering the best possible upside — wherever that may be around this great town.

Yet, Cobb County government’s behavior to this point has done no favors for a proposal that is best considered dispassionately — and openly. That would have been the best way to reach the best deal for all concerned, we believe.

And it should be the way forward from this point on for Cobb’s county commission.

Andre Jackson, for the Editorial Board.


Cobb rightly seized fast-moving opportunity

Posted: 12:00 a.m. Saturday, June 14, 2014
Atlanta Journal Constitution

When the Atlanta Braves approached us about building a new stadium in Cobb County, it was a tremendous opportunity for our community. And like most opportunities, it was only going to exist for a short time.

The team wanted to move from its old stadium. Cobb County had the infrastructure, the capability and the ideal location for this to happen. We were the best choice­ — but we were not the only choice.

Even metro Atlanta was not the team’s only choice.

With discussions of moving the franchise out of downtown it was a priority for me to get the team and their planned $400 million private development here in Cobb. Thousands of new jobs, hundreds of millions of dollars in local investments and new economic growth are now on the horizon. Thanks to our community and their support, this move will benefit metro Atlanta and boosts the region’s economy with every game.

The necessity for a fast process frustrated some, even as most residents celebrated. We were aware of our critics’ objections. We held meeting after meeting after meeting to discuss everything with the public. We posted details to the Internet and shared it with the media.

We held almost a dozen public meetings between the announcement and last month’s vote. Opponents routinely attended and detailed the reasons they felt we should not help bring the Braves here. We listened. And though we do not believe they are correct, we respected their concerns.

Individual Cobb County commissioners held their own public meetings to hear from both sides. Commissioners kept a careful tally of those who called and emailed their offices with opinions both for and against the stadium agreement. The numbers were overwhelmingly in favor of this deal.

We worked to ensure residential property taxes would not rise as a result of this project. Businesses near the new stadium will bear a substantial portion of its construction costs and the team itself will invest $280 million upfront and another $6.1 million annually for 30 years. These figures exclude the estimated $400 million the team plans to spend by creating an entertainment district around the new stadium.

Cumberland area businesses are willing to help support this agreement because they understand what it means for them. It means customers. The Board of Commissioners understands what it means for the county. It means jobs. It means visitors. It means an unparalleled economic boost that will benefit the entire county. It means funds that will help keep our tax rates low.

We could have held a year’s worth of meetings on this topic with the only result being that the team would go elsewhere. The fundamental objections of critics would remain, the huge support would remain, but the opportunity would be lost.

Instead, this will be a successful project for the public and the region, because we made the right choices for Cobb.

Tim Lee is chairman of the Cobb County Board of Commissioners.


3 Responses to Cobb County Board of Commissioners Blocks Opportunity for Dissent

  • In April, Chairman Lee tried to present himself as a leader who values transparency in government. That was clearly a change in the attitude with which he entered into secret negotiations with the Atlanta Braves and the Cobb Chamber. Both the Braves (through John Schuerholz) and the Cobb Chamber (through Brooks Mathis) have both declared that if the project had been done openly, the people would never have gone for it.

    It’s a shame that the Braves and the Cobb Chamber of Commerce are hypocritical enough to take advantage of our democracy and all the benefits that have allowed them to ‘succeed’; it’s a disgrace that they’re stupid enough to brag about it.

    Surely our Cobb government is better than this.

  • Good afternoon Chairman Lee,

    I read your pro taxpayer funding article of the Braves stadium in yesterday’s AJC. As an opponent of any taxpayer financing for sports venues, I have a few of questions.

    You, along with other politicians around the country, tout the fact that these projects will bring in future tax revenue that will benefit the taxpayers via all of the new jobs the project will generate. Since the jobs related to the construction of the project are short lived, to what jobs are you speaking? The part time stadium jobs and the minimum wage jobs produced by the Braves’ entertainment area does not give me a warm and fuzzy feeling. In 2020 what are the industries you speak of that will produce the jobs and taxes that will offset the taxpayer money utilized for the stadium?

    Since the stadium is located in the tax district, will there be a tax on ticket sales over and above the normal sales tax?

    Will the Braves pay property tax on the entertainment area?

    I noticed that the two companies in the forefront of the pro taxpayer funding of the stadium are Superior Plumbing and Loud Security. Both of these companies are located outside of the tax district. Have Superior and Loud volunteered to have their property tax increased to the same rate as the outlined tax district?

    Why have the promise of a maximum of taxpayer money of $300M ballooned to $396M?

    It is a known fact that when Atlanta had two NASCAR races, the total economic boost to the local communities was greater than all four stick and ball sports in the city for their entire seasons. If you are counting on folks from Chattanooga, Birmingham, Macon, Columbus, Athens, Greenville attend a Braves game and not go home after the game, you are not living in reality.

    Also, the Braves reneged on the same commitment to build an entertainment area for the G Braves stadium. What guarantee do we have this will not occur in Cobb County?

    In closing, in my 67 years I have never seen the taxpayer portion of a public/private venture not exceed the promised amount. Remember, you promised!

  • Chairman Tim Lee’s [sic] arguments in favor of a hasty rush to judgment concerning the use of tax dollars to pay for moving the Braves to Cobb County is full of more holes than a box of doughnuts. For example, his claim that there is overwhelming support for public financing flys in the face of a poll reported on by the AJC on 5/14 which showed that 64% of those polled oppose public financing.

    His claim that there were dozens of meetings to vet public opinion is patently untrue. How could that be possible when there were only 12 days between when the details of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) were made public and when the Commissioners voted on it? The few meetings that were held told a different story. Despite the well financed PR campaign by the Braves, the overwhelming majority of attendees to Commissioner Helen Goreham’s Town Hall meeting on the subject expressed opposition, and this was duly noted by the media. The meeting held by Commissioner JoAnn Birrell was a stacked deck, with paid staffers of the Cobb Chamber — and their children — packing a small library meeting room hours before the meeting was scheduled, thereby crowding out opponents who couldn’t find seats.

    The meeting I attended, held by Commissioner Lisa Cupid, also had more opponents than supporters speaking against the MOU. And the meeting held by Commissioner Bob Ott was evenly divided, despite the efforts of the well oiled Braves PR machine.

    It’s unfortunate that the Chairman has to resort to lies and half truths to bolster his case for ramming this outrage down our throats, but that’s all he has, bless his heart.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Confirm that you are a real person. *